1. Choose two points of agreement from the list and explain why they were significant for the future peace of Europe.
First Point: "They agreed that as countries were liberated from occupation by the German army, they would be allowed to hold free elections to choose the government they wanted." This point was significant for the future peace of Europe because it basically ensured the spread of democracy in Europe, attempting to prevent the rise of anymore dictators there in the future.
Second Point: "The Big Three all agreed to join the new United Nations Organization, which would aim to keep peace after the war." This point was significant for the future peace of Europe because it created a new way for the countries in Europe to negotiate and handle world problems, attempting to prevent future major disputes and causes for war.
2. Read Sources 2 - 11 on pages 320 and 321. What is your overall impression of the Yalta Conference based on these sources?
My overall impression of the Yalta Conference based on these sources is that from an outsider's perspective it appears that the Big Three had a genuine alliance and were working and collaborating well together, but from an insider's perspective it's obvious that each in the Big Three had some sort of contempt towards the others, and all were quite wary of one another. Russia appeared to be a threat, and Churchill wanted to prepare in case anything happened. Although Roosevelt must've been fairly objective, according to these sources. Basically, while the Yalta Conference had an inspiring and comforting front, tensions and skepticisms were still running wild between Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt.
No comments:
Post a Comment